Darkman140 on DeviantArthttps://www.deviantart.com/darkman140/art/Ph-D-In-Bullshit-202830327Darkman140

Deviation Actions

Darkman140's avatar

Ph.D In Bullshit

By
Published:
479 Views

Description

Back in the MP bussiness, bitches.

It's kinda sad really, how old is he? 40? 50?

I doubt his Philosophy teacher met his theology teacher or himself in person, if he did, we would've killed him and then commited suicide.

But i really want to know how he got his Ph.D, seriously now, how? i want to know the name of the university and the teacher who approved him. :iconfacepalmplz:

I won't even begin on how stupid his argument is, just look at the dislike bar.

"God is the creator and matter of the creation"

News ya'll, fuck every scientist and philosopher within the human species, for a creationist in the deep anus of the US has shown us superior logic that our minds can't come to comprehend.


The video.

[link]

This fucktarded piece is brought to you by your average christian fucktard. :iconlevite:

Whom i had the displeasure of having a conversation with when a recently took the position of athiest.

"You seem to have little knowledge of scripture"

Yes, fuck historical documents, let's base it all on scripture. :iconheaddeskplz:

As the fucktard i was, i had little knowledge of stuff, and didn't point out his critical mistakes.

Fun Fact: He is among the 190 non-evolved brains who liked the video.

He also liked this.

[link]

SPIRALS BITCHES, YOU SEE IT IN EVERY GALAXIES, except the ones who went ape shit, those just look like a train wreck, also, fuck cosmology and physics, leave it alone, really :iconemocornerplz:

He is also part of the fucktarded group :iconda-creationists:

Go and have a talk with the founder, you'll find him quite interesting. :iconsarcasmplz:

SPOILER: He thinks gays are as bad as thieves, posting an MP about it ASAP.

Dawkins is not impressed.
[link]
Image size
750x600px 50.41 KB
© 2011 - 2024 Darkman140
Comments10
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
I'm not saying he's right but can you state what it is about William Lane Craig's argument that is wrong. I just want to know what it is so that I can go learn more about it.